Find current Auditions in your area
- Project
ID # 107156
| Project Type |
Other
|
Submission Type |
1
|
| Location |
|
Union |
1
|
| Rate/Pay |
$ per
|
Release Date |
12-31-69
|
| Audition Date |
12-31-69
|
Submission Deadline |
12-31-69
|
| Shoot Date |
12-31-69
|
|
|
| Casting Category |
1
|
| Market(s) |
|
|
|
|
Seeking 10 talent(s) for this role
|
| |
|
|
Actors needed.
|
Searchable talent specs:
Gender: Male Female
Age: from 21 to 65 |
|
|
|
Find Auditions in your area - View this
Casting Notice
Find Auditions, Castings & Casting Calls
Melville said he "desires that public access be maximized within the limitations of the concern for an unbiased jury pool and a fair trial
"
He said he felt he had met that requirement by releasing a portion of the indictment containing the charges and sentencing considerations
Melville expressed concern that "in the extraordinary, high publicity environment of this proceeding, the integrity of the jury pool is threatened" by possible disclosure of evidence that may or may not be admissible at trial
Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville, who had said at the last hearing that he would consider releasing the entire indictment as well as the grand jury transcript, said he had reviewed the material and decided to keep all of it sealed
Attorneys representing media organizations including The Associated Press had petitioned Melville to release the names of unindicted co-conspirators and 28 overt acts listed in the indictment
"It's impossible to believe that there was nothing in the transcript or indictment that could be released without jeopardizing Michael Jackson's right to a fair trial," she said
They also asked for release of the transcripts of the three-week grand jury hearings that led to Jackson's indictment More Secrecy in Michael Jackson Case
Jun 10, 10:31 PM EST
The judge in Michael Jackson's child-molestation case drew a curtain of secrecy tighter around the allegations Thursday, continuing to seal not only grand jury materials but also requests for release of unspecified evidence
Loyola University Law Professor Laurie Levenson questioned Melville's ruling and whether he could have disclosed additional materials
